From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo-kill-buffer Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200610240856.57965.amax@redsymbol.net> <200610241651.45400.amax@redsymbol.net> <200610241722.09016.amax@redsymbol.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161736470 31276 80.91.229.2 (25 Oct 2006 00:34:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 02:34:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcWhm-0000cw-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:33:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcWhl-00045m-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GcWhU-000455-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GcWhP-00044t-MA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcWhP-00044q-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.188] (helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GcWhP-0006uA-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.83.239]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20061025003250.QZZM1747.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home> for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 34B9885A0; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Aaron Maxwell In-Reply-To: <200610241722.09016.amax@redsymbol.net> (Aaron Maxwell's message of "Tue\, 24 Oct 2006 17\:22\:08 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61136 Archived-At: > Yes, i use C-x k . Mostly it happens when I am doing some development that > happens to involve a large number of files. Often then I will try to kill > buffers I'm no longer working with, just to help keep organized or other > reasons. I (almost) never bother to kill buffers I'm no longer working with. > Sometimes I'll kill a buffer (file) in this way and a moment later > realize that there is another change I need to make. Does recentf-mode help? Stefan