From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package management proposals for Emacs Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:19:35 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87k4erh6q3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5uie42.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y635dll9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r58vbj7o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwpba03q.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5rqr5z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxjjpal4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcy6nzan.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqo94sbw.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303867194 1638 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2011 01:19:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 03:19:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPw-00062e-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 03:19:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54593 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPv-00072c-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPt-00072G-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:19:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPs-0002bl-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:19:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPs-0002bg-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:55333 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEtPl-000854-NN; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1810E660D8; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:19:35 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:46:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138822 Archived-At: >> OK, you can propose it later when the GNU ELPA (note the difference >> between "ELPA" and "GNU ELPA" btw) has been around for a bit. > Can't we choose some other name for our package archive > that doesn't cause confusion with another one? Ours is an ELPA, it's just not the same one as the one originally setup by the original author of package.el. So what we need to is to avoid using "ELPA" without specifying which one (GNU's, Tom's, or some other one). Stefan