From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: abbrev_defs encoding issues Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:52:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: <4DECB91E.9070904@online.de> <4DED112A.9040905@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307398846 18052 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2011 22:20:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 07 00:20:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTiA5-0006RF-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:20:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTiA4-0003AV-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTev0-0000PH-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTeuy-00070l-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:52:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTeuy-00070d-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:51381 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTeux-0000NX-Hs; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4110B660DD; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:52:49 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <4DED112A.9040905@online.de> ("Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hle?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?r=22's?= message of "Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:40:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140244 Archived-At: > if an .abbrev_def is saved from v24, which has been edited from v23 before, > all german umlauts gets destroyed for example: This diff only shows that the byte-sequence has been changed, not that the result will behave differently. Since the encoding is different, it's no wonder that non-ascii chars get represented differently. Do you actually see ill-behavior? Stefan