From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: [emacs-w3m:11603] Re: interactive-p obsolete Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:10:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E13FCE4.8080309@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310074622 13552 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2011 21:37:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 23:36:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QewFk-0008Dv-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42898 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QewFj-0002zl-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QewC7-0001vv-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QewC4-0006wy-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:57818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QewC4-0006we-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p67KAmOg018986; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 878D6B4177; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:10:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4E13FCE4.8080309@easy-emacs.de> ("Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=F6hler=22's?= message of "Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:12:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3911=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3911> : streams <658570> : uri <909096> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141754 Archived-At: > I'm in favour of keeping interactive-p, resp. undoing that change. interactive-p is obsolete, which means you should move away from it (mostly because it needs an extra arg to know what you mean since it's been used with two different meanings). But interactive-p still works just as well in Emacs-24 as in previous Emacsen, and I'd be surprised if the same doesn't hold for Emacs-25 (and probably 26 as well). Stefan