From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9926: patch: emacs-24.0.91 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:31:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1320101671.5171.11.camel@hp.my.own.domain> <1320754903.5597.30.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320759138 27371 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2011 13:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 9926@debbugs.gnu.org To: srs@kth.se Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 14:32:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlma-0001QF-7d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:32:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlmZ-0004Sd-Rd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlmX-0004SV-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlmW-0001I5-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:32:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlmW-0001I0-M0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlpN-00012s-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9926.13207592914002 (code B ref 9926); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2011 13:34:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlpD-00012U-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlpB-00012N-7B for 9926@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:34:49 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AusGAJsuuU5MCoYy/2dsb2JhbABDmluPKYEGgXIBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDYg5uCOJLQSIC5lahEg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,477,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="146854927" Original-Received: from 76-10-134-50.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.134.50]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Nov 2011 08:31:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1F4E2590B2; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:31:47 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1320754903.5597.30.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> (Svante Signell's message of "Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:21:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:35:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53695 Archived-At: > Anyway, which are the differences/consequences of that part of the code > in which_symbols being executed compared to not when GC_MARK_STACK is > unset or set to GC_MAKE_GCPROS_NOOPS? They don't matter: which_symbols is a function only for use from a C debugger: there is no call to this function within Emacs itself. Stefan