From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows' "split status" Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vcqqoekt.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBD6B63.4050607@gmx.at> <87vcqq6utg.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> <87d3cwr9hc.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFA0AF.7000608@gmx.at> <87obwgatpy.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFFBA5.1000309@gmx.at> <87hb26gdx8.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC213EA.4080304@gmx.at> <871ut9n2rr.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC2820E.7010401@gmx.at> <87y5vhs04e.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87obwc7ixv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321450472 27529 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2011 13:34:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 14:34:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQfdB-0000eu-Lw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:34:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41422 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQfdB-0003AI-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQfd9-0003A1-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQfd7-00041t-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:64557 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQfd2-00040j-NW; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:16 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAOC6w05MCqs//2dsb2JhbABDqXaBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgVuRSKFwSIFJlwhEo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,521,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="148202426" Original-Received: from 76-10-171-63.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.171.63]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Nov 2011 08:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F0EE55936A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87obwc7ixv.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:08:44 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146058 Archived-At: > Good idea, but I think `window-combination-limit' fits existing Emacs > terminology better. We could let a value of `t' have the binary window > tree behavior for now, and defer numerical values for post-release. I still don't understand in which circumstance you'd want a limit other than "2" or "infinity". Stefan