From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17446: 24.4.50; What is the situation around `called-interactively-p'? Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tx8z6sp2.fsf@gmail.com> <819a6ab8-db8e-4176-a778-02218f08e7af@default> <6e5610f3-d741-4d61-903c-a8f3aa8f46fd@default> <87siojasqx.fsf@web.de> <87r442x00n.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnv6mba5.fsf@gmail.com> <87r442f46r.fsf@gmail.com> <87siohx7rg.fsf@web.de> <878uq8luvj.fsf@web.de> <877g5ki8sv.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400378248 13477 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2014 01:57:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 01:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17446@debbugs.gnu.org, Thierry Volpiatto To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 18 03:57:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLo-0005qn-Gs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 May 2014 03:57:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLo-0000lt-6y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLe-0000kc-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLW-00020o-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLW-00020k-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLW-0003qM-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 01:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17446 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17446-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17446.140037820914750 (code B ref 17446); Sun, 18 May 2014 01:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17446) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2014 01:56:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51843 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLI-0003pp-T1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:46266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlqLH-0003pf-8p for 17446@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s4I1uh3n002400; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AEB236018D; Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877g5ki8sv.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sat, 17 May 2014 20:01:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4945=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4945> : inlines <881> : streams <1185878> : uri <1760146> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89202 Archived-At: > my last question was: should `repeat-complex-command' set > `this-command'? See my example. If the answer is "yes" - shall I > create a separate bug report? It probably should, yes. Just like execute-extended-command does. Stefan