From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Robin Templeton <robin@terpri.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Requesting review for change to lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:32:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv8uf5abck.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9ttbtq6.fsf@panthera.terpri.org> (Robin Templeton's message of "Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:07:29 -0400")
>> Another way to look at it is that the attribute name is indented
>> 2 spaces with respect to the element name, so things are working
>> as designed.
That's indeed the way I look at it.
> That makes sense, but it seems inconsistent with the behavior of other
> major modes in similar contexts. For example, Lisp indentation is
> relative to the enclosing delimiter rather than the operator name.
It's a philosophical question. I tend to look at XML's <...> as
a parenthesis-like thingy that encloses a sub-language.
> Another option would be to adopt nxml's solution and add a new variable
> for the attribute indentation relative to the tag delimiter, which has
> the additional advantage of allowing attribute and element indentation
> to be customized independently. It could default to `(1+
> sgml-basic-offset)' to avoid changing the existing behavior.
Yes, that's the main issue: the two are distinct cases that should
have separate indentation rules.
I think we all violently agree on this.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 10:35 Requesting review for change to lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el Jackson Hamilton
2015-03-08 0:49 ` Fwd: " Jackson Hamilton
2015-03-08 8:10 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2015-03-08 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-10 0:07 ` Robin Templeton
2015-03-10 1:32 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2015-03-21 20:20 ` bug#20161: " Jackson Hamilton
2015-03-22 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-03-22 15:39 ` Jackson Hamilton
2015-03-23 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv8uf5abck.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=robin@terpri.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.