From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why "EMACS=24.4.91.2 (term:0.96)" in term-exec-1? Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874mp2oq8b.fsf@gmail.com> <837ftyzgw7.fsf@gnu.org> <87oanaecj0.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427747302 14372 80.91.229.3 (30 Mar 2015 20:28:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 22:28:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YcgHz-0005eX-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcgHp-0007lE-5d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcgHl-0007l6-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcgHl-0004eu-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:34324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcgHf-0004eV-2G; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYxrAgECAQKDPgMDg20EqDs X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYxrAgECAQKDPgMDg20EqDs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="114987412" Original-Received: from 65-110-216-75.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([65.110.216.75]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Mar 2015 16:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 01B3CAE11F; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:27:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87oanaecj0.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleh Krehel's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:21:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184566 Archived-At: > Thanks, Eli. Is it time to get rid of the binding for EMACS, just like > the comment says? I think so, yes. The same applies to the "EMACS=t" binding used in shell.el (as discussed recently). Stefan