From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 08:54:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83si5t7njo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443792946 20865 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 13:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 15:35:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi0Um-0007jx-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:35:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi0Ul-00010G-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhzqk-0007Fh-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 08:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhzqj-00047h-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 08:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:7182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhzqb-00044g-BG; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 08:54:01 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A2FgA731xV/wihxEVcgxCEAoVVwwsEAgKBPDwRAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBAQYCAR+LOoUFB4QtBZtkgzMTjgOGEoFFI2GBKRyBbiKCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0A2FgA731xV/wihxEVcgxCEAoVVwwsEAgKBPDwRAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBAQYCAR+LOoUFB4QtBZtkgzMTjgOGEoFFI2GBKRyBbiKCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="166945271" Original-Received: from 69-196-161-8.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.161.8]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2015 08:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7FD7C6227C; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 08:54:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83si5t7njo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:11:07 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190683 Archived-At: > But when there's nothing to commit, I'd expect vc-next-action to > update from upstream. Yes, indeed, in some rare cases it can indeed notice that commit is not an option and suggest something else. > So calling it "vc-commit" would be wrong, and removing the update > (a.k.a. "checkout") part from it would also be wrong, IMO. That's why I said I was not 100% serious. Still, AFAIK in typical usage of modern VCS, vc-next-action ends up doing a commit about 99% of the time, and its "dwim" behavior is largely useless. Stefan