From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 012487b: * lisp/display-line-numbers.el (display-line-numbers-type): Autoload it. Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:02:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170723072843.23485.53761@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170723072844.877FD22EF0@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87inijxnda.fsf@detlef> <83r2x57orp.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9s97lul.fsf@gnu.org> <83fudl7k0p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500926576 8425 195.159.176.226 (24 Jul 2017 20:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 24 22:02:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjZ0-0001bV-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjZ6-0006om-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjYz-0006oV-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjYv-0000z5-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36489 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjYv-0000yM-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:02:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dZjYo-0000vQ-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:nptnYHr+0414EuRo27TlJLyaq8E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216998 Archived-At: > I'd need first to better understand the problem and its proposed > solutions. How can you expect me to make up my mind about this > without at least that much? As of now, I don't understand well enough > the choice I have; without that, Michael's code looks to me as a > perfectly valid solution for a real problems, and I see no reason to > look for an alternative. As far as I know, there was no "real problem". There was only a byte-compiler warning. He chose to silence it with an `autoload', because he thought the warning was real. Glenn pointed out that a simple defvar to silence the byte-compiler was sufficient, because the warning was spurious. Stefan