From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#28691: [PATCH] Add file name handler support for 'make-process' (Bug#28691) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20181216233936.208568-1-phst@google.com> <83a7l4dpls.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg853y8.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545076568 1193 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2018 19:56:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 20:56:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYyzk-0000Di-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:56:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz1r-0002d3-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:58:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz0y-0002bf-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz0v-0004jQ-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:20 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYz0r-0004hW-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wBHJv5XT009754; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 001C66AA6E; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877eg853y8.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:49:19 +0100") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6440=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6440> : inlines <6986> : streams <1807416> : uri <2766158> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231895 Archived-At: >> "Remote" is just one possibility. It can also be local under >> a different UID, or it could be local in a virtual machine, ... > The current implementation regards both cases also as "remote", provided > by Tramp. file-remote-p returns non-nil. > It might be unfortune, but I don't recommend to change the function's name. I'm not suggesting to rename that function, but I think we should try and keep this as an exception rather than start using the word "remote" always meaning "as defined by file-remote-p" rather than the more common meaning. Stefan