From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about display engine Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:28:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <97f66744-8481-084a-ef23-2c50444e1f05@gmx.at> <20190906093117.25qfim4kcrmiqunk@Ergus> <83o8zw5zh8.fsf@gnu.org> <83mufg5yn1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190908005109.s7hhcczkrcbzewdc@Ergus> <83imq24qx3.fsf@gnu.org> <20190908182346.hheaveun2pw5usb6@Ergus> <20190914204207.gfyvgbb7t4ztya7a@Ergus> <561ed601-fb63-d6c6-5eff-8a873f6cbd62@gmx.at> <20190915112602.2ifhmmqsfpjd5jhj@Ergus> <6c4b1cc1-f108-f3ee-d85a-38ac901c7a0d@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="82495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 15 16:29:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9VWg-000LLX-70 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55162 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9VWe-0004JE-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9VWY-0004J1-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9VWX-0003Bz-2s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:64658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9VWV-0003BI-PU; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBCF01007C0; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A5241004B3; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1568557741; bh=MyzRoVn8XIj+e8QM9UmAvt4/UdHe9wAfYu6QuvK8HUQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mrDnwIixH4/mx4QcnUPATUCTkJ2ocvcbjZ+YzeCYYqDhzZregg/7AsGJdut67qkG8 q49rDn3OwSePu6bqgYAVFr6jDe5+jOigtUOGGGnpBpyEjSTQTLI3Fagd3FUkESJ15+ NgjV0CJdadGdf8kLxSYm3MPnJaocN+ND0EapFLT9FGR6cTg2U8PKa5GtD7XPzs7pMp wHFRSmgmq9eNfhEOQdvdB+kM8ZFebGWZOL8fhMwexYO8jyjTZwtnSOjx3UM4TOo/+S qQJ7RPDGQXUq6WIhwNQymT05lIgW/lWkH6XDXDBFUPxXBk3orMSTBpUufbXfe58PB9 i8IE4zw1tyk3A== Original-Received: from pastel (104-222-123-223.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.123.223]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0469120308; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:29:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6c4b1cc1-f108-f3ee-d85a-38ac901c7a0d@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:22:50 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240047 Archived-At: > M-x customize-face RET region RET C-x h > > Here there are two areas painted with yellow3 background instead of > the region's blue3. I see no particular reason for that behavior. I'm not sure what you're describing (the colors don't seem to match what I see), but it sounds like normal behavior (smaller overlays having precedence over larger ones). Stefan