From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: evaluating numbers Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <875zjw2emg.fsf@gmx.net> <618B38D9-CD34-4200-8CA1-1A6B0922A83A@traduction-libre.org> <871ruk2d3f.fsf@gmx.net> <3C929D7B-1C10-4713-9EDA-55C80FC36AD8@traduction-libre.org> <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmyd6rw.fsf@gnu.org> <835zjucwbz.fsf@gnu.org> <628A3663-BDD3-47C5-B4F4-E260FD900691@traduction-libre.org> <83o8xla50f.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ex9sow.fsf@gnu.org> <4836980E-C425-466C-BB86-5E962C4B3F96@traduction-libre.org> <83zhgy7qxq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="110538"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 14:55:41 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFb3-000SaV-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:55:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFb2-0007EF-0F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFaw-0007E6-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFav-00031D-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFas-0002xA-A9; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB64D449CCE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AEC1B449CCC; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573739728; bh=6Lr1P7tfrRVSXKkIUCwOi1JBvtwr0voT3IFjK9aK2yQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vqdi8Bich7zVUBYGcO3s/CeQvi78jtXEvkgheWktwm+eDc795gQfr3CUkVO3fSG64 uNKA71mhjgWjnPC8uWjzaLr1lyf42qruvXhleFpabMGz2i0RAxRBEuDVKobM/Vfok9 lgDVYrVgOgMkRrfeWGHBvz3aWQk+iOEk9q9DZexy7cyJCelXHgJC5/qYQ/G7yuPIee UgRNYZdkGVxqPyZ0V+HUj4hzhLs8RHvq+IBlBkW3j+tVRN2ONH9WJMbZG6+GoXi2T8 hQpuPaTrcP4adNAxwtsknYvhrfgy4JF0Mt8AEtoQCZ/z5DJYKHPahvzVkuwQEN1M22 xyWudj0ArCcCw== Original-Received: from pastel (206-248-133-142.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.133.142]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44A1C1210D6; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:55:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:46:21 +0700") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242157 Archived-At: > A non-confusing solution to the issue =E2=80=9CI have a code point and I= =E2=80=99d > like to know which character that is, but I don=E2=80=99t want Emacs to s= pend > time trying all fonts to see if any of them has a glyph=E2=80=9D could be= to > show the Unicode name for code points greater than > eval-expression-print-maximum-character and less than (max-char). > > 232 (#o350, #xe8, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE) > 1114109 (#o4177775, #x10fffd, ) To the extent that "LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE" can't be used to write 232 I don't like this suggestion, but I think you're on to something: what if eval-expression-print-maximum-character was used only to decide between `?` and `?\u` ? Stefan