From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is font fallback slow over X11/ssh? Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:22:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5zc62183.dag@gnui.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="43373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Dmitry Alexandrov To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:g/rVeVRVp/TvHiDGDmyRwGKrD60= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 17:23:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEBm-000BBB-LW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:23:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37442 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEBl-0007Y2-Nu for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:23:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEBH-0007UT-6q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:50314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEBG-00061T-KB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:22:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEBE-000AZK-Su for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:22:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.161.202; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/05 11:22:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123242 Archived-At: > And itʼs not unexpected in the light of hypothesis above: typically, > there are just much less fonts available via ‘x’ than via ‘xft’ / > ‘ftcrhb’. Oh, right, that's the part I had overlooked, thanks, Stefan