From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient in elisp Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <00ce8ae3-bb21-c58f-cd32-c196f146842b@daniel-mendler.de> <6fed43bb-d880-bcd5-6f6f-004b6182e539@daniel-mendler.de> <83pmxlo2z0.fsf@gnu.org> <922437d2-74ca-a7aa-cd1d-060f31d383e6@daniel-mendler.de> <83o8d5o0od.fsf@gnu.org> <186aa7ae-605d-3959-b923-ee5817c939f0@daniel-mendler.de> <83mtspnseg.fsf@gnu.org> <837djsobhw.fsf@gnu.org> <83tumwml3q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10998"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: mail@daniel-mendler.de, bugs@gnu.support, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 16:56:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lk6Zg-0002eC-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:56:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk6Zf-0001l0-R6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk6YQ-0000ho-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:42713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk6YP-0000eH-9r; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 86D15805F3; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F047B80602; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1621608902; bh=bJDkcLNVBB0LBza9YcD4GtfAovJ2jWKNpLajWUHX+pc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NR5tDE+/0pYepO9lvPjCROpyPw/KFdgBwQysHOZBsBEstRrSZoAw5kygATGLhk0yx JrfJ7MzaMXGtJDorvlmoGI15pHqs6a4NPv7fVuVhGIe3ATzQnz3iHtBgRhYofsKsVc uR/QCKelORaHmZj/xJP8Mn7V52V1LoLoDjjsRWIdrYVD5XAK0kaRzTAQ5RDbZzjCFm 0qEUCLSIwk1pk8iqa7qebiDt7j6OMkQ/37P1FQXgEG+2FXNPxCdUZ+D+WkigeNSvo8 mmSp2bOzPrvM1Mzfz30GEmYXgYfcEUoVpCB4zth0VE6sYbMqJn21Eo6jP9xc3v/6vX JH/ZOCPSqCJwA== Original-Received: from alfajor (76-10-140-76.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.140.76]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC3751202FC; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:55:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83tumwml3q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 May 2021 13:34:17 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269561 Archived-At: > Btw: in batch mode, read-from-minibuffer returns when it sees a > newline, so you could still use the above if you'd process each > incoming line, and then issued another read-from-minibuffer call only > when the processing was done. The next line may not come from another half-hour, or even "for ever" if the other side is waiting for our (asynchronous) answer before sending the next command. > So the situation we have doesn't look too bad to me. There are cases where it's usable, but there are cases where it's a non-starter. Stefan