From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-lib warnings Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86o7s3lsnx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86bknx8783.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837cylapt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn6kamwr.fsf@gnu.org> <83len0aldq.fsf@gnu.org> <83k02kadbv.fsf@gnu.org> <83a63fap35.fsf@gnu.org> <83bknu8tmo.fsf@gnu.org> <18E95AC5-1FFC-4025-B804-7D70DDB1BD75@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Yuan Fu , Eli Zaretskii , =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= , juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 24 15:09:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p95D1-0004ru-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 15:09:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p95CN-0003QE-O3; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p95CL-0003Pq-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p95CK-0007CN-F1; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 54D94441043; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D8F7E4409C5; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1671890900; bh=jStaX4g1PGL6Z/YNkfYaycWwFea8IgfDQ8LV9ptA7KA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jDDmRpOcKjdoty/lZSPOztlW7Te6fL6/skspn5bkXyaR8f2P4BoUJaLJs9/iOiTYp k/E5sxIJbDOoZeJIhms7n96Z+cc+Z026lcWdaed5JcPPa/F+eTGErDQ1WQvz5gCJWg fUYUQjPzeo+QC85ARm8IU1+QLzLyNUmanOwFdfIy71DsNu9RKjjxga8bWRyM73DeSo phju1w5VNr35/miVEtYT88Mb96x6KWIVWsymixfofWOv0JDHvLQgcp/fIA3GRaunuo Jgd6Joh6Nr0An/hh+tLvsFMzcr3D9aA8yRNI+IJINb4MCEBcwJdmkhq1LkRxqTw/V3 skYCHhJAU0BMg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.200.228]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 865141209A9; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:08:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sat, 24 Dec 2022 01:24:57 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301839 Archived-At: > It is expressive, and sometimes the easiest way to do something, but it > certainly looks unLispy. Perhaps elisp should've adopted the iter macro. Which "iter" macro are you referring to? BTW, nowadays for non-trivial loops, I like to use `named-let`. Stefan