From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist` Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:51:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <159cd3c2-a0c4-63e2-ebb2-ce0f5f8c343e@gmx.at> <69e6899b-9e93-9a97-a8bc-4ce9a9f0ae4c@gmx.at> <69387717-1eaa-6019-0000-4c95c61e1bc3@gmx.at> <1f026837-af56-435f-9d4e-048a18af07eb@gmx.at> <488b181f-c74e-d97b-b168-a602158c3e7b@gmx.at> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2437"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67249@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 24 14:53:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r6WcT-0000QI-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 14:53:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6WcA-0001xk-Mh; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6Wc5-0001xQ-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:52:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6Wc5-0000zN-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:52:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6Wc9-0005Bw-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67249 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67249-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67249.170083393119900 (code B ref 67249); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2023 13:52:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6WbK-0005Au-SC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6WbH-0005AG-JY for 67249@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BA79807A4; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:51:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1700833916; bh=gQFIU9tH+eodMBsFyrkEk4pBXi5iYe8NQdn3nn4zq0w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=NJBVA41Vtkrznf7eYP5ClZuLF9AYG+Tnlm4tZ/8R6cpwBUJEk8RklOiIJdzteB1ia /Ak/wuJA1jW+0o0Vci61YPjCyn+jGfHx9OwwjR3Kf4X6niLEVCKDaxhHjgi8yHBBtx mHwiG5qeLRlzuYLvehnWaEF3RIW4Dfjyll3WCDoV7zGpn7dsPKf3RGlovttprvHp/I B2ZAkaeEOIZjPcccPP2vIAJK3RjBTe4QJxxfHAhXCg9LPiUHAks1E8oR5ZB/7eAPFP sOttIYpjNw5jCqDGGYYjugcdQyf0Y3XSax1+UDAwTNSOSJZyHwn4xoln+jXW+qsOdt C1gbqCFVF916A== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 566C9800E7; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:51:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.227.120]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3493F12022D; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:51:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <488b181f-c74e-d97b-b168-a602158c3e7b@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:05:20 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:274860 Archived-At: >> +(defun display-buffer--pop-up-frame (buffer alist) >> + "Like `display-buffer--pop-up-frame' but ignores `inhibit-new-frame'. > This seems to have an extra "-". Indeed, thanks. >> PS: Am I the only one who finds it confusing how some functions >> named `display-buffer-` are meant to be used from the ACTIONs >> (i.e. from within `display-buffer`) while others are implemented on top >> of `display-buffer` (and thus should not be used within ACTIONS)? >> Could we try and find a clear naming convention to distinguish the two, >> or am I even more confused than I thought and several of those functions >> can be used either way? > > Do you mean 'display-buffer-override-next-command' and > 'display-buffer-record-window'? I mostly noticed `display-buffer-other-frame` whose name (to me) suggests it can be used in an ACTION. The two you cite could be considered as colliding, but since their name doesn't suggest they're going to "display a buffer", they didn't bother me. Hmm... after looking a bit more maybe it's not that bad, since the calling convention can be used to distinguish them (e.g. `display-buffer-other-frame` doesn't take an ALIST after the BUFFER). Stefan