From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: locals.texi Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:31:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <17571.1885.899074.211162@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152030884 11660 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2006 16:34:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 04 18:34:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxnp0-0000KR-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:32:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxnp0-0005HB-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxnok-0005Gh-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxnoj-0005GA-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxnoj-0005Fu-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fxo2Q-0004fw-6d; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759402CF672; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90072445C; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:31:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7F3BE6C8DB; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:31:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:57:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56503 Archived-At: > (set (make-local-variable 'font-lock-defaults) > '(gdb-memory-font-lock-keywords)) > 1. It is always cleaner to use separate calls to make-local-variable > and setq. That's not true. *You* may always find it cleaner, but it's far from a general truth. E.g. I strongly prefer to keep the two together (actually I'd like to introduce a setq-local macro for it). Stefan