From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Minibuffer for M-x dired broken Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 21:25:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877ieey3ym.fsf@gmx.de> <87tzhiwn9y.fsf@gmx.de> <87r6ckbidb.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209778359 28641 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2008 01:32:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 01:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 153@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 173-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, rfrancoise@debian.org To: Sven Joachim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 03 03:33:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Js6cE-0006K9-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 03:32:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58772 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Js6bW-00059G-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Js6bR-000564-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Js6bO-00051v-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56380 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Js6bO-00051h-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Js6bO-0003rx-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:47748 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Js6az-0003UJ-8Q for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Js6bK-0003rX-Qj for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182] helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Js6bK-0003rL-Gv for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoICADJdG0jO+JghdGdsb2JhbACBU5AVASeZXQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,429,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="19843845" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2008 21:31:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([206.248.152.33]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id JGI78945 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 21:31:45 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 11DE4705C5; Fri, 2 May 2008 21:25:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r6ckbidb.fsf@gmx.de> (Sven Joachim's message of "Fri, 02 May 2008 21:45:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96361 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22188 Archived-At: > I do quite like the latest completion code, Glad to hear it. > but can imagine that other people might find it a bit confusing. Time will tell. > Also, if a directory has no non-trivial subdirectories, C-x d TAB > completes to . and .., which is probably less useful than immediately > listing all possible file name completions. Good point, Stefan