From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes? Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vdqvedpd.fsf@freebits.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236117737 26017 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2009 22:02:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Tobias C. Rittweiler" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 03 23:03:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lechl-0008O5-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:03:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32996 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LecgQ-00030f-7E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LecgK-0002ye-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LecgI-0002wA-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39516 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LecgI-0002vx-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:42 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:50201) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LecgG-0007P7-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-170.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.170]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n23M28qf015889; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8CA64A2C22; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:01:26 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87vdqvedpd.fsf@freebits.de> (Tobias C. Rittweiler's message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:07:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3223=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109425 Archived-At: >>> I'll file a bug report as soon as Stefan confirms that it is one (it >>> should, it's quite weird to be on a line of function1 and get >>> function2 evalled). >> Yes, it's a bug, of course. I believe I've fixed it, > That does not seem to be fixed properly: > 1 > 2; point here, then C-M-x > (defun foo () 42) > This evaluates `foo'. Yes, same as in Emacs-22. C-M-x presumes you're evaluating a "defun", not just a constant number. Stefan