From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Printing Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5f0660120903281352v5d7ab83cy44fcff3cbf4581cb@mail.gmail.com> <20090402100822.GC28589@tomas> <20090402115119.GA29256@tomas> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238679473 22776 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2009 13:37:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 02 15:39:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LpN8E-0002RV-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:38:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43987 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpN6p-0004D4-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpN6e-00049b-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpN6Z-0003zS-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41595 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpN6Z-0003yy-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:18894) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpN6X-0001Tg-46; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:13 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjoFAChc1EnO+Lq2/2dsb2JhbACBUs47g3wGhQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.39,314,1235970000"; d="scan'208";a="36089153" Original-Received: from 206-248-186-182.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.186.182]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2009 09:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 26A288446; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:37:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:49:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110002 Archived-At: > Writing a pdf-file would of course allow printing on w32 more simple > too - if you install some software to read and print pdf. Considering that I'd rather not encourage people to install proprietary software, is it really significantly easier to install support for printing PDF than support for printing Postscript (in Windows)? Stefan PS: This said, I agree that pdf-print.el would be welcome.