From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not loading the Registry settings Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4AAB93D4.8070201@harpegolden.net> <87skerr30v.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252965223 16404 80.91.229.12 (14 Sep 2009 21:53:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David De La Harpe Golden , Emacs developers , Miles Bader To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 14 23:53:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MnJUN-0004XD-Gi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:53:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnJUN-0002yb-0L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnJUA-0002wX-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnJU5-0002vI-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48382 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnJU5-0002vF-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:38898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnJU3-0007mF-RM; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n8ELrBAq032150; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 45E553A28A; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:53:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:54:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3362=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115321 Archived-At: >> I think that's OK, but the double-parsing of -Q is not >> very satisfactory. =A0I'd rather see a new variable Vinhibit_x_resources >> instead, which the Lisp code could set to non-nil when it parses >> the -Q argument. > I think I've misread this bit in my previous answer. Do you mean that > all the -Q processing would be done in startup.el? Yes. > I think it is too late then to affect to some initializations that > read from X resources / Registry. What I did instead was to > process -Q in emacs.c and set a Lisp variable for startup.el. I guess it'd be OK to move it from Lisp to C, but I'd first like to understand which initializations take place too early to be affected by Lisp code. Stefan