Re: Not loading the Registry settings

[Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>]

>> I think that's OK, but the double-parsing of -Q is not
>> very satisfactory.  I'd rather see a new variable Vinhibit_x_resources
>> instead, which the Lisp code could set to non-nil when it parses
>> the -Q argument.

> I think I've misread this bit in my previous answer. Do you mean that
> all the -Q processing would be done in startup.el?

Yes.

> I think it is too late then to affect to some initializations that
> read from X resources / Registry.  What I did instead was to
> process -Q in emacs.c and set a Lisp variable for startup.el.

I guess it'd be OK to move it from Lisp to C, but I'd first like to
understand which initializations take place too early to be affected by
Lisp code.


        Stefan