From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make-variable-buffer-local change Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:07:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200909251609.n8PG97YN020225@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <200909251707.n8PH7nuk020712@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253913008 10145 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2009 21:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 25 23:10:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MrI3E-0007lB-3P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:10:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MrI3D-0008AM-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MrI1r-0007aG-VM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MrI1m-0007XB-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60468 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MrI1m-0007X4-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:33582) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MrI1m-00017h-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n8PL84oZ023868; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A09693A227; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:07:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:49:28 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3371=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115638 Archived-At: >> Isn't it slightly more efficient to access global bindings than buffer >> local bindings, > No. Sorry, I think I misread. The answer is "yes". But the efficiency is the same for a variable after make-variable-buffer-local as after make-local-variable. Stefan