From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83bp5te3s8.fsf@gnu.org> <83eiajdee6.fsf@gnu.org> <8339qycsa4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290118566 22504 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 22:16:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 23:16:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJCls-0005xK-2S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJClr-0006cx-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43941 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJClk-0006cb-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJClk-0001qs-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:38996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJClk-0001qL-1t; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAIMFn9s016990; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8D643A8268; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:44 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8339qycsa4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:04:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3683=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132838 Archived-At: >> > Btw, how to display code points smaller than 256? \uNN or \u00NN? >> I think \u00NN is the clear winner. > It's according to RFC 5137, so yes. > But what about code points above MAX_UNICODE_CHAR? Currently we > display them as [E+NNNNNN]. Use \eNNNNNN? I think \xNNNNNN would be preferable, since that's what we use elsewhere. Stefan