From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face vs. mouse-face text property Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pqegeluf.fsf@web.de> <87y5t2f7q0.fsf@web.de> <83vco52wph.fsf@gnu.org> <87bopv8jla.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327332884 930 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2012 15:34:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 16:34:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RpLup-0002Oa-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:34:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39732 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpLup-0001mQ-4j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpLuh-0001l3-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpLub-0002az-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:3736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpLuS-0002Yv-9F; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:16 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACZ9HU9MCos2/2dsb2JhbABCriaBBoFyAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSID7gpjCYEiDuac4RX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,556,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="158219900" Original-Received: from 76-10-139-54.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.139.54]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Jan 2012 10:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A356358D29; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:34:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:43:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147852 Archived-At: >>> Therefore, I think if we want to be able to display selectable >>> newlines, we need to have a special way to display such newlines, >>> e.g. "" or some such. >> I'd suggest \n rather than , since it's already used at many other >> places in Emacs (tho it's not often visible to the "end user"). > Why not show "\n" with a special background face? Which part of (propertize "\\n" 'face 'escape-glyph) makes you think that we wouldn't want to show \n with a special background face? Stefan