From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Obsolete redisplay-end-trigger and lazy-lock.el Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <510B7BAD.6010908@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359733173 20796 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2013 15:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 16:39:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1IiW-0005qb-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:39:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1IiE-0003a7-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1IiA-0003Z1-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Ii5-0004fg-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:39648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Ii5-0004fb-Lq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0KABK/CFFLd/iW/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: At0KABK/CFFLd/iW/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="200281" Original-Received: from 75-119-248-150.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.248.150]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Feb 2013 10:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 53B8558F88; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <510B7BAD.6010908@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:24:13 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156759 Archived-At: > This stuff was marked obsolete in 2008, and the only user is lazy-lock.el; > if the latter has no real users, can we drop its low-level support? That would entail removing lazy-lock.el. For Emacs-24.1, we dropped the "obsolete since Emacs-21" but not the "obsolete since Emacs-22", so I think I'd rather not do that yet. Unless there's a particular reason to want to remove redisplay-end-trigger, of course. Stefan