From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ehfalotd.fsf@yandex.ru> <87li9eqdoe.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364067883 20003 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 19:44:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 20:45:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJUNH-0008Sa-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJUMt-0002fF-JW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJUMp-0002f5-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJUMo-00073A-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:10272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJUMo-000735-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:38 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="5628404" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.174]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Mar 2013 15:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 43F0867C02; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:44:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87li9eqdoe.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:33:05 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158090 Archived-At: >>> I'd also like to know the current state of affairs. >> It's described in elpa/packages/README. >>> company-pkg.el was updated ~12 hours ago, yet the new version of the >>> package still hasn't been built. >> The cron job is run once per day, so you may have to wait up to 24h. >> Also, the cron job may fail if the copyright lines aren't right. > Thank you. The rebuild interval doesn't seem to be mentioned in README, > though. It says "nightly", which I thought was clear enough (tho it doesn't say which timezone is used, so it ends up meaning little more than once per day). > Could you also advise on my current problem with company/.dir-locals.el? I don't understand what is the problem with it: > I added it to the repository, because Emacs committers sometimes install > changes into elpa branch directly. Seems OK, yes. Actually, we could/should even place one in elpa/.dir-locals.el. > And yesterday I added there a setting for > `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column', to honor the existing formatting > in docstrings, and it's not safe-local by default. Hmm... feel free to mark it as safe-local, but of course that won't help users of Emacs<=24.3. > Should I remove the file, the variable from it, or can we add an > exception to not add .dir-locals.el to packages? It doesn't seem to warrant such measures. After all, the user can just say "accept and consider this value as safe from now on". Stefan