From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: no gnupg directory under elpa? Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:58:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tx8bsvp4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r43es0wq.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87iooqw7k6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mwe2rva3.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401278352 17859 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2014 11:59:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:59:12 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 28 13:59:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcVc-0002vy-9W for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:59:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcVZ-0008Ug-1D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcVH-0008TT-EG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcV8-00075g-P0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcV8-00075Z-Ip for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpcV6-0001zI-9H for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:58:32 +0200 Original-Received: from 75-119-247-212.dsl.teksavvy.com ([75.119.247.212]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:58:32 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 75-119-247-212.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:58:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75-119-247-212.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5qF2bba2DYa4nsOenC9BFZ8bT8w= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:97912 Archived-At: > All installed packages are red and unsigned, and have *nothing* in > their archive column -- it's not just ELPA, it's also Melpa and > Marmalade. Please M-x report-emacs-bug about it. > It sounds like the feature must still be implemented, everywhere. Indeed, IIUC the necessary sig-checking code was added to package.el but the GNU ELPA scripts haven't yet been updated to generate those sigs. > Emacs makes a nice root-kit platform, i hope security features for the > package system(s) are high priority for them... am i being realistic? Somewhat high, but not super high, no. Stefan