From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs: are multi-char parentheses possible? Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:21:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402366931 9437 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2014 02:22:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 10 04:22:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WuBhK-0002gz-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:22:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuBhK-00070W-Bg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuBhA-000708-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:22:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuBh3-0005gm-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:61653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuBh3-0005fr-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:21:45 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNLd+D9/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgBA6kZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNLd+D9/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgBA6kZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="66394260" Original-Received: from 75-119-224-253.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.224.253]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Jun 2014 22:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3147F60329; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 22:21:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:14:37 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172428 Archived-At: > Thanks for the confirmation. With the syntax-table property the normal > sexp motion commands actually work. But I was in a smie mode which > redefines forward-sexp and the lexer and grammar aren't setup to handle > << and >> so it appeared forward-sexp failed. Maybe you "did something wrong" there, but SMIE normally tries to obey the existing syntax tables (and syntax-table properties), so maybe you saw a bug in SMIE. Stefan