From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117912: Minor improvements to new stack-allocated Lisp objects. Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:08:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411362643 22817 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2014 05:10:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 22 07:10:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XVvtR-0000kJ-WC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:10:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVvtR-0005q2-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVvt2-0005oz-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVvsu-0002EY-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:58946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVvsu-0002Dd-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:10:00 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ4g0rAPYEXF3SCJgEBBFYjEAs0EhQYDSSIDNIZF44jVweEOASpGYFqgXF/XCGBLQ X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ4g0rAPYEXF3SCJgEBBFYjEAs0EhQYDSSIDNIZF44jVweEOASpGYFqgXF/XCGBLQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90516131" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.145.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Sep 2014 01:08:54 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3D8A966089; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:08:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:49:29 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174634 Archived-At: > * frame.h (FRAME_PARAMETER): > Prefer scoped_list1 to local_list1 where either would do. Do we really need those scoped_* thingies? I'm already doubtful that the local_* thingies will be useful, so I think distinguishing between local_* and scoped_* is way beyond the limit of diminishing returns. Stefan