From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Turning off colorization Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:08:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a944cm3x.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83r3xfs8mx.fsf@gnu.org> <92fcc04e-6837-4038-83bf-0a2583bae2ef@default> <8361errpc7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415376541 8259 80.91.229.3 (7 Nov 2014 16:09:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 07 17:08:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmm5k-00041W-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:08:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60862 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmm5j-00036G-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:08:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmm5K-0002uL-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmm5D-0005RK-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:08:26 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:58165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmm55-0005N7-Eg; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:08:11 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IPAS-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,797,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="96210409" Original-Received: from 75-119-235-29.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.235.29]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Nov 2014 11:08:10 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B4D708874; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 11:08:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8361errpc7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:40:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176535 Archived-At: > But we ourselves are inconsistent in this respect. E.g., > file-name-shadow-mode does its thing disregarding font-lock. I'm not sure I'd put file-name-shadow-mode in the same category. `font-lock-face is intended more for things like Info-mode's highlighting, of highlighting of list-packages or list-buffers, and would seem appropriate for eww (tho, according to this discussion maybe not). Stefan