From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA build status? Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:16:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87inz44v8u.fsf@oremacs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461673010 28062 80.91.229.3 (26 Apr 2016 12:16:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:16:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 26 14:16:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1av1uy-0008D8-9Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:16:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37711 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av1us-00087N-6h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av1um-00084K-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av1uh-0004cf-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av1uh-0004cZ-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1av1ue-00085d-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:16:21 +0200 Original-Received: from 45.72.141.36 ([45.72.141.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:16:20 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 45.72.141.36 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:16:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.72.141.36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+1Q80Bc1UAe7S4Z+oBF2/h0w+cc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203331 Archived-At: > I've pushed an update to GNU ELPA, renaming swiper-0.7.0 -> ivy-0.8.0. > However, http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ hasn't been updated yet, even > though it has been more than 20 hours. It can take up to 24h (and more in case of errors). It's there now, and there wasn't any error, so I guess it simply fell into the "more than 20h yet less than 24h" window. > MELPA has this nice feature where it displays e.g. "Current build > started: 3 hours ago, last took 6 hours" on the website. Could GELPA > have something similar? Some "internal status" report would be good, yes. > I've followed the notes in ELPA's README, and built the local package > archive. That took almost no time. Perhaps we could modify the cron job > to trigger more often? Good idea. I've just changed it to run every 12h. Even better would be for elpa.gnu.org to receive the commit-diffs emails, and to only rebuild those packages that have seen changes, so it can be done "immediately". This would both be faster and more efficient. > May I have access to this machine so that I can trigger the manual build > when I need? I'd rather limit the access to those who administer the machine or work on the build scripts. Your needs really apply to most GNU ELPA contributors, so if we give it to you, we'd also have to give it to all others, or almost. Stefan