From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New pp Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:57:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pokampa4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87innrc03h.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87k27w8j2l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489251526 18665 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 16:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 17:58:41 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkLl-0003yW-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:58:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkLr-0007sy-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:58:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkLM-0007sh-Ni for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkLJ-0004Ga-MA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=41554 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkLJ-0004Fv-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkL3-0008PR-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:57:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:wqLZCKi6va5yhoDznZUr+4gvURQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212913 Archived-At: >> No, the problem is when we run for example the >> >> (cl-defmethod cl-print-object ((object vector) stream) >> >> method (which AFAIK takes precedence over the >> >> (cl-defmethod cl-print-object (object (pprint-state (head :pprint))) >> >> method, so it will receive a pp-state stream and pass it on to `princ`). > Oh yeah, that is a problem. Is there any way to get a higher precedence? We could change the cl-defgeneric to specify that the second arg comes before the first when ordering methods with (:argument-precedence-order stream object). But it still feels brittle. Stefan