From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@redhat.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>,
29165@debbugs.gnu.org,
Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:54:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv7etom71d.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E1EB8C9-8692-48F6-BBA0-826DCA7F819B@redhat.com> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:17:18 -0500")
> Why is this different from "… &optional ,@optargs” in a similar form, when
> optargs could have no elements? Rejecting that was (part of) the point of
> Noam’s change (and the previous change for bug 24913).
It's not, and I also think rejecting it is generally unadvisable unless
it has a performance impact.
> I think I’ve already made my objection to that part plain, but it
> seems like rejecting an empty &optional and accepting an empty &aux
> would be inconsistent.
Inconsistency is part of life, tho.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-15 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 6:57 bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 12:44 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-06 14:24 ` Drew Adams
2017-11-06 14:35 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-06 14:40 ` Drew Adams
2017-11-06 17:20 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-11-06 17:25 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 18:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-11-06 19:10 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 19:16 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-13 18:06 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-13 19:42 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-13 20:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-27 22:24 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-13 22:36 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-15 16:48 ` Glenn Morris
2017-12-16 4:54 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-20 22:10 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-21 3:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2018-01-21 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 16:30 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-21 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-03-25 15:32 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-13 23:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-15 1:16 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-15 3:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-15 5:17 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-12-15 13:54 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2017-11-06 19:31 ` Drew Adams
2017-11-06 16:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv7etom71d.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=29165@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
--cc=raeburn@redhat.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.