From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: better than read-hide-char Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:15:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <829cc468-873a-39bb-cce9-29dffbf4d1d1@lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533140042 2857 195.159.176.226 (1 Aug 2018 16:14:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 16:14:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 01 18:13:58 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fktl6-0000Zd-Dg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 18:13:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fktnA-0003ea-To for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fktn4-0003eP-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fktmz-0000t6-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34869 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fktmz-0000sq-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fktkq-0000HP-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 18:13:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:bYmcxFcm2x69RnWtyclxCOkAqQs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228088 Archived-At: > Doesn't displaying even 16 bits of any hash of each prefix of the password > leak those prefixes, each guided by the last? No doubt. IOW it's probably a bad idea. Stefan