From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:53:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tvcq9b0w.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217641"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 00:55:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hd0X5-000uUt-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:55:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hd0X4-0000st-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hd0Vp-0007pn-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hd0Vn-00025g-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:51037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hd0Vm-00023E-7U; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9312D100946; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:54:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C5AA210089B; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:53:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1560812038; bh=VdGFIGDbAIpEC1B31hLYUONPc8MIJmHo7aqD8ZTAvu4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NYJWbT7MdwtUVi22vKvbSMZD50PBwC+Q859SSp3X6jo+KYVPzDuoY3SRsLh3aDjyU asFXofYtYFhY3JX6qHsKugn8+XzkghDwE+bRMPwIGIPTEJjCY+zxmW8NJnZu2YGkPN 1+m9silyoBRU5PvQ48efOOcl6oyZ7knmWqvL4aV4NWk0FM6b9C4AaDdnnT0GsiLUZa rtTXFiBQkTfYDqPcgDH5bo5AZ4BneNBp2g4+Gi9PO2sV7MzSJ1pGaBWmT8qqU2M2rB uxnAnJ41O0cHuJ5tkfw5Wk7KxqRWz1cAcEX7oeACCEm0nokB5+eKkWwpEymikv+3gx +e9mTiO4saKxg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.10.58]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92288120AC4; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:53:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:52:12 -0700") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237812 Archived-At: >> In any case, I think deprecating byte-compile-dynamic is a better >> solution than trying to fix its many shortcomings, since I don't know of >> any concrete evidence that it has any real benefit. > This sounds good to me as well. Should I write up a patch or is this > a controversial point? I'd like to have confirmation from Eli that he's OK with it. Stefan