From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More build times Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87czexj5tg.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmiwj1st.fsf@gnus.org> <874k08iyrd.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16376"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Yuri Khan , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 10:32:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o5NgZ-00043G-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:32:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34384 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5NgY-0000hz-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5NfB-0008Fg-Bn for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5Nf8-00054Y-Fs for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7CDF24408C1; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 59D9A440865; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1656232230; bh=nQTMarmOpaOAxrpmurvS0uEz0M+dQXy6TXfbJtKN8BU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MhMdMOBI9v0IbMMI9Iur8BFn8nIRGCDvYBxaB4Wmjd4zck1YY8rwVZ3WQAJaXlV/T XMAivHF+eeaT59mujdlV58810f2ldm7MSajL44zaMC1K+ntCYthJNWJG85X8/+P+il qdP6ELGDXlzYIxkZG5+TaC4jAWrJ6rUo6vOx5Y6T9Ej/NNl3z0tEQ2SgQpeMe4DGfx oTlc9rXPGNrvNTVEUnaBkjs2aTp2Pr6RO+O8yjNxtFgH+2SDJUjHiyaow9yCncazB1 2bXOGm/w6kf70DvOlbZarm6HAq7WVlIO3GqdDSuglNtsO3apHX7yG3g/H7YPHW7pfT 3KcilDjF1QeDg== Original-Received: from alfajor (165.63.10.93.rev.sfr.net [93.10.63.165]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9929B12020A; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 04:30:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874k08iyrd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:49:42 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291626 Archived-At: > Ah, thanks! With --first-parent, I seem to be getting the state I'm > looking for (I think). I've now re-started the benchmarking thing, so > in a week we should know whether that makes the graph smoother. =F0=9F= =98=85 `--first-parent` will probably avoid the commits that are actually on `emacs-28`, because I think we do these commits "correctly", but I'm not sure it'll be reliable enough in general. `git bisect` needs to solve the same problem, so maybe we should look at how it does it. Stefan