From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eglot to core [Was: rmsbolt.el [Was: Colorful line numbers]] Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87leslpow2.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilnpl8e0.fsf@gnu.org> <874jz9peq0.fsf@gmail.com> <837d45l6ge.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgh1nyo6.fsf@gmail.com> <831qudl1k3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8rpntiv.fsf@gmail.com> <83sfmtjjy8.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsitnpxd.fsf@gmail.com> <83k085jgxr.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu77vq1a.fsf@eve> <874jz6mj6b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29526"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 24 21:06:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oFgvU-0007SQ-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 21:06:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFgvS-00026H-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFguL-0001B2-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:57171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFguJ-0004GJ-21; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 367CA440F0A; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25DB0440D17; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1658689488; bh=IYw5Lvd3qglJ/QXZ4t/W/29M/CXJObvUEW4XcvajTT0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=donpTUdOQ5uZfVkp/04NbBTKvaB76hlOuFFq4oU8KrgvGnb34gU0jmMTt1xNNohiT NqdSpowc+x5nMBmZdpyTHA4fMZ+Gd8NyEatUlm/NJuEofrG7KkmefOo2zha6UjgR9a R9U3VdpYkAiiO3fODFqi2XZ5mfYMFrlbDaffWSmjNyn7/UEW2rceSbk2aiSyEiX3Ok I7o9AHAbQsH89oQYUixgwKsV45nRP78f3mASyeELCUguyZWOt9ZlUP/SSPCd2qw7Z3 VSdaenSQygitJxXKbMtglcRerkGXredo5nBdR4JWCFW0Td00AWvCnZnD2R+wc1sHt1 n6czZD3IqF9Sg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.111]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD98912024D; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 15:04:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874jz6mj6b.fsf@gmail.com> (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vo?= =?windows-1252?Q?ra=22's?= message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:58:52 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292615 Archived-At: >> So, yes, `eglot` in GNU ELPA is now stuck and you'll have to merge >> `c558fd6a24` back into your upstream repo before it will start tracking >> it again :-( > OK done. Let me know when it's running again. Thanks, it's fine now. I'll let others chime in for the details of where to put what. [ Personally, I think the better option is to leave it in a separate repo/branch and integrate it via something like Git submodules. ] > What do you think of this plan, is it feasible? If I were doing it I wouldn't like it (because of having to keep two sides in sync), but it's probably feasible, yes. Stefan