From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays? Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:43:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874jw37764.fsf@rfc20.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 02:45:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1okEFy-0007yd-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:45:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEFw-0003dI-J1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEEo-0002vo-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:7428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEEm-0002zv-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:44:13 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B22B10011D; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:44:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7E998100030; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:44:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1665967441; bh=nZZp+eMytKgBrqPnW5EPrN76pC+AFHHwldKSz6jDujQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hvPNA9BVGXbgaQVKkMwvqWiKejBQnG5lJYvouVf5qCl4MgfIzovpTwQZFC+x0l5uD oAOeu7So5siavKUUGeCSOSEZM0kaAD0S/M0iiUdxesvnoqIXf6EY8zDOqnSnY70Frr YQHFHa/INTHG1xcAU+tpO+2r5zQVDw08JAM//Bmoc3wouLkE2ASHLzR38g+admBrWv dMuSnBgxJJzuVgJMXQtrs+LGemYHbs3GCvUT5RAxHlZtANteTi3jvi+DGh7p0U+zrZ ODDe6sMS8b2EYHOA70OZ1tNhIivHNe5TWgoWRBYl2SLP5D5zi4In6DWVsio4eVt59C DDBDgYSzc9vRw== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EEC1120DB1; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:44:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874jw37764.fsf@rfc20.org> (Matt Armstrong's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:08:51 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297898 Archived-At: Matt Armstrong [2022-10-16 15:08:51] wrote: > I've spent the last few decades coding with an undersanding that > "inline" is about linkage and allows one to place code in header files > so that it *may* be inlined, but that compilers long ago stopped using > it as a meaningful inlining hint. But this is mostly colored by how gcc > and clang behave with C++, and not much else. I believe what you say does hold true for "optimized builds". I'd be interested to know if it's true for lower levels of optimization as well. Stefan "compiling with -Og"