From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:53:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt3b4yfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87edonlsxi.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyf4vzb.fsf@gnu.org> <871qknllkj.fsf@posteo.net> <83fs934pjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfd2g2ek.fsf@gnu.org> <875y9yfxrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1muefks.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40385"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , larsi@gnus.org, Robert Pluim , Eli Zaretskii , 62720@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 18:55:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMhb-000AKT-UD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 18:55:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMhW-0000Bw-IJ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMhS-0000BD-V9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMhS-0004OE-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMhS-0003kW-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168149124714110 (code B ref 62720); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 16:54:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMgY-0003fV-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:61267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnMgW-0003eu-9c for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 988ED80B0E; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:53:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B74B80250; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:53:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1681491237; bh=ttllu3SOwplft2XTHpbPmQrbsEYn7gTRWKOuQfcG7yA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KhcZDrng6L1IW61QPKJj2eWDoKs02+h3yG0OpjGn/ikSFhLjNSLMr4cv0nspsHjKp kaRfzWAs4I8gep+p4tnLfAzVlgyBPeRTWqJWF9v4VwR195hV1xzapaiU1DuRx3jqJn mbQh11CrTDWRIhM1Fry75oiwnJ6xCnzg2Kf5qPT+eQjenDZSvIY8M6Bvx6JB29i6Ny KMT67oKsDB9wJtvf+hKgcEpVQ1fNpELfWmrItRbLBfNYDbSFCjmXZq0ol4Bykds+XH CEEyn7GEzOb4l0OXrZXHW4zYkA9s/e4KFT8g2iBs0R7fKtDHGJLep0KW2kz/B5lV+7 K2n24lGjCTwkQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable005.21-80-70.mc.videotron.ca [70.80.21.5]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECC8A120328; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:53:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:40:44 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259943 Archived-At: >> BTW, for me the reluctance to upgrade when asked to install isn't due to >> the risk that the package is "unstable". I'm not completely sure what >> is the reason, admittedly, but it's closer to viewing it as a silent >> "change of distribution", or maybe it's because I like to know when >> behavior may change and merely installing a package shouldn't change >> Emacs's behavior. [...] > functionality to your existing modes, well you _did_ ask for the > package to be upgraded No, as the first line above shows, I'm talking about "asked to install", not "asked to upgrade". Stefan