From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74276: 30.0.90; undo does not account for overlays now that markers are not used Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:05:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86jzdcsyc1.fsf@gmx.net> <86fro0omey.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17139"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: karthikchikmagalur@gmail.com, 74276@debbugs.gnu.org, James Thomas To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 16:07:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n3e-0004Jz-Iv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:07:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n3H-0004kl-M3; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n3G-0004kY-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n3G-0000ZF-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:07:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=fzb7+eM44wa0Hyka6H1IvPSMCjdoMaOCrLq07v1rWs4=; b=e4o3FuPW486Zdz4cGa/ada7BunXpn4HwYnV7SNOdpHKJAHKoCeWlJpt3p1+3RnicpoTXukeK2RcFUXcMe/WhLzTSClWIWtLaQg2r4tPo7huvJq4+F9P3zUUFYBErRUjrHqcdBFmUcwHL0oxo2LGAO3zY2qT4Wi8j5sr0KWtjNc8BfhFEohz/eaftVdpT4GNHJ/bzs/veIA3MpHtdUz9R/L/xRXyZPI3A6J0zCuKIdS9NY9rQ23HbS9PxEtkoJWlrowjeYTtNrkb+H43B67ZUso4qEpZYvrTVarEs7wZD7LlMDKkJB+MvvsIFkOHN2/ZN3h4znBZ5n7HAe7/FRL4ltg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n3F-00007K-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 15:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74276 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74276-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74276.1731164771391 (code B ref 74276); Sat, 09 Nov 2024 15:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2024 15:06:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n2Q-00006F-Lg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:36829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t9n2N-00005j-Er for 74276@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DF5D1440BBC; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 10:05:59 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1731164759; bh=7U5UfsafOQVW/R5TjjqTufDtJSpwLLsIYyyXrqyvvrk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hnfhuBu5PMKSiaEf3JKreEnq7xj3UrN2CxiEWeIDKnEgr5l3Y612sKpFI9q7NNpOX eTlaj1TuL44oO7BleCfcUkR5U5WzY/m7+RwnEp2z45/uLEHFJ1bKjQdaSVcrmL1ogl 1McXnnFGR+W/FlVYoEa58mKIBMSFlamSl4uEuAp2b7XLBOVxOcgTcRONQ6PwrOmFVj kq0uPLyAAAVE15s6OK/BZIkxV1y6i/yjG6iDfRU8/YQf93NBreguuq6jdXJa1xIz1l 0Oi+jHdph6XJNc6jkZA2ua3nP5OsEhKjXdOnL9NuCh65BAj7Eh2F0VkQPlFMvCme9s t7NQQxStBOuPw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0AE2D440B62; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 10:05:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C96B91203E2; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 10:05:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86fro0omey.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:12:53 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:295135 Archived-At: > Stefan, does undo restore overlays, and if so, how? No, I don't think `undo` has ever tried to restore overlays. But it does attempt to restore marker positions, so I guess there can be cases where the switch to itree has caused overlays' boundaries to be restored less well than before. Stefan