From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete? Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228856460 32048 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2008 21:01:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 09 22:02:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LA9iD-0002ih-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:01:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LA9h2-0000fU-Pl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LA9gw-0000f3-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LA9gv-0000ek-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49557 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LA9gu-0000eg-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:24 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:57759) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LA9gt-0005Np-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:00:24 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-230.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.230]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mB9L0IBq011261; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3ECBE1C91C; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:00:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:01:49 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3165=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106739 Archived-At: > With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete? I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of PGG author(s) and users. Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete? Stefan