From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unfill-paragraph (region) and indentation Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:40:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zl747u59.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <878wemeic7.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257360079 23391 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2009 18:41:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 04 19:41:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N5kn7-00076Y-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:41:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5kn7-000749-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5kn2-00073n-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5kmx-00072w-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36373 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5kmx-00072t-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:26264 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5kmx-0000It-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:40:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUEABJZ8UpFxJaf/2dsb2JhbACBT91ChD0EiHc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,681,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="48690850" Original-Received: from 69-196-150-159.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.150.159]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2009 13:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A9DB9941; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:40:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878wemeic7.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:43:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116635 Archived-At: > That is why I wrote that small delete-indentation-region function which > works perfectly for this example. > But I am now curious why is message mode special, I mean which is the > setting which is responsible for this behavior. It depends on the definition of what is a paragraph, so it depends on paragraph-start and paragraph-separate. But FWIW, I can't reporduce the behavior you describe in fundamental-mode in Emacs-23.1. Stefan