From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next emacs version? Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <56D10E2523764AC98D99CEBC55DBAD93@us.oracle.com> <83iq8sigyq.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3z0i3nu.fsf@gnu.org> <911BA1D06CEB4306924D0069BA2D3DFF@us.oracle.com> <83bpeki18a.fsf@gnu.org> <85D696D9907C42A389AA65E4BC83CDD7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269122027 21804 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2010 21:53:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 22:53:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt6by-0003bd-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:53:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt6bx-000329-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt6bt-00031m-AS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43840 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt6br-000319-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt6bq-00048e-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:4959 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt6bp-00048Q-6f; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:29 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANbgpEtFpZMX/2dsb2JhbACbPXS7D4R9BIsd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,279,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="58679410" Original-Received: from 69-165-147-23.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.147.23]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2010 17:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 073457FBC; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <85D696D9907C42A389AA65E4BC83CDD7@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:29:03 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122385 Archived-At: > That would involve my code with the bug-fix code (logic). It would impose Not at all. It simply amounts to writing the unit-test that checks whether the bug is fixed: (string-match ) It's simple and robust. Stefan