From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mark for refontification Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270911822 17727 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2010 15:03:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 17:03:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0cDh-0001Od-SK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:03:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0cDh-0003m1-Fp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O0cCp-0003T2-EX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56084 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0cCo-0003SW-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0cCm-0003YA-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:42293 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0cCl-0003Y4-Vo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAMYvwEtMCqWu/2dsb2JhbACbQ3K5W4UMBItG X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,182,1270440000"; d="scan'208";a="60590199" Original-Received: from 76-10-165-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.165.174]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2010 11:02:39 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 42A4B7F1B; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:12:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123438 Archived-At: > Still, when I find that an old chunk really is invalid I must mark (at > least part of) it for refontification. That's perfectly fine. But if *you* need to refer to buffer positions outside of point-min...point-max then *you* need to widen, not "mark-for-refontification", Stefan