From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add notifications.el Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:26:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1275757657-15244-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> <201006092018.10163.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <87ocfkkpgg.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <201006092116.46374.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <87ljaoyom4.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87631rzzxd.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276129586 7257 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2010 00:26:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Julien Danjou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 02:26:24 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMVbC-0002rz-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:26:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52072 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMVbB-0002Ov-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:26:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46129 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMVb5-0002NV-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMVb4-0003tJ-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:16624 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMVb4-0003t9-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:26:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADPOD0xLd/Rv/2dsb2JhbACeW3K/NoUYBIxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,395,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="67721441" Original-Received: from 75-119-244-111.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.244.111]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2010 20:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B8B0681B5; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:26:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87631rzzxd.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> (Julien Danjou's message of "Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:58:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125691 Archived-At: >> Just so I understand better the trade-off: what would it take to pass >> `id' to the on-close function? [... sample patch ...] So it seems it's very straightforward. Now, not having used anything closely (or even remotely) related, I don't have a good feel for whether that would be very useful. So if someone else could help us make a choice, that would be good. I'd lean towards adding the `id' argument since it is useful to make the call "unambiguous" and also because that `id' is otherwise "difficult" to get. Stefan