From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7252: hexl-revert-buffer Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287628981 3276 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 02:43:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7252@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daiki Ueno Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 04:42:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8l7G-0005oS-RE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:42:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8l7D-00035A-FA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55454 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8l74-00034R-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8l73-0004rw-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8l73-0004rs-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8kiE-0000vs-3X; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7252 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7252-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7252.12876273753571 (code B ref 7252); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7252) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2010 02:16:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8khT-0000vY-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8khR-0000vT-AA for 7252@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:16:13 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AukJALNAv0xMCpO7/2dsb2JhbACgWnpyv0eFSgSSGw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,214,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="80277949" Original-Received: from 76-10-147-187.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.147.187]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Oct 2010 22:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0D8DD66112; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:20:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daiki Ueno's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:00:23 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:17:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41022 Archived-At: >> No, we should tweak revert-buffer-function instead. > Ok, how about this? Looks good (even better than I thought since I hadn't noticed the *-revert-hooks). Assuming you've tested it, please install it. Stefan