From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8025: 24.0.50; vc-bzr does not perform initial commit Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:10:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86hbc9yscs.fsf@gmail.com> <4D6D1CA3.4050307@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299087635 14032 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2011 17:40:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8025@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 18:40:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Puq2H-0003va-B1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:40:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Puq2G-0003V0-Pz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:40:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40363 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pupyx-0001OD-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pupyw-000279-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pupyw-000275-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PupZm-00056G-70; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8025 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8025-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8025.129908582219546 (code B ref 8025); Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8025) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2011 17:10:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PupZ8-00055D-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PupZ6-000552-VE for 8025@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:10:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.96.179.97] (port=36435 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PupZ1-0001eS-Cq; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 30F90660D6; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:10:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D6D1CA3.4050307@gmail.com> (Christoph Scholtes's message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:19:47 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:11:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44514 Archived-At: > `excruciatingly slow' does not mean anything to me. Like several seconds. Current bzr is much better in this respect. If we can fix the function, of course it's still better since it's not only faster but even works on remote hosts and in the absence of a bzr binary. Stefan